Fantasia 2012: Easton’s Article Time Travel Premise Masks a Darker Origin
Written and Directed by Tim Connery
Leave it to a time traveller to arrive late for a party! Easton’s Article arrives at the Fantasia Film Festival a year after films it would have been natural companion pieces with, like Fantasia 2011 films Brawler, Bellflower and Another Earth, films that used a thin veneer of genre to illuminate stories about the most f****d up personal relationships possible.
In the case of Easton’s Article, the genre is time travel and the veneer is very thin indeed. The film’s biggest weakness and biggest strength is that it is not really a time travel story at all. Oh sure, it has the trappings of a time travel story, but that is simply a mask for a story genre much older and darker than time travel.
The set-up for the film is that Easton Dunning (Chad Meyer) is a computer engineer who somehow manages to pull into his 1997 “Super-Computer” information from his own future, specifically his own obituary and a set of instructions. In investigating these artifacts from his future, Easton is drawn back to the hometown – and the girl, Hayley Reed (Kristina Johnson) he left behind years before. Easton’s bruised and alienated relationships with his hometown and Hayley are the heart of the picture. Easton clearly loves both Hayley and his hometown, but also fears them and fears opening the wounds that time and distance could not completely heal.
Easton’s Article is not a time travel story with physical time travel, nor is it the kind with a labyrinthian type plot like Robert A. Heinlein’s classic By His Bootstraps or Shane Carruth’s Primer. In fact for a time travel story, Easton’s Article is almost embarrassingly linear. It shares elements in common with films like Frequency and Cryptic or the James P. Hogan novel Thrice Upon A Time, by postulating that while people or objects can’t travel through time, information can. The chief difference is that all three of those stories believe in a fluid time stream that can be changed as easily as shaking an Etch-A-Sketch, while Easton’s Article is more pessimistic about the ability to change one’s fate.